home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nuclear.microserve.net!news
- From: jshaffer@mail.csrlink.net (Jim Shaffer, Jr.)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.networking
- Subject: Re: Help. I need doc of AcuSeeMe
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 96 00:12:00
- Organization: ->POEE<-, Carlos Allende cabal
- Message-ID: <19960327.79F00D8.2F3@localhost.UUCP>
- References: <623.5358T784T1827@mail.telepac.pt> <19960322.79FC558.12483@localhost.UUCP> <31a7cc$f135.7d@tis_news.thepoint.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pmwill2_9.csrlink.net
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- X-NewsSoftware: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
-
-
- In article <31a7cc$f135.7d@tis_news.thepoint.net> chronos@mercury.thepoint.net (Jeremy Zanone) writes:
- > Along the same lines here, what does every one think about the
- > Acuseeme, as apposed to the IBM version? I like the ami version better in
- > the way it updates the window. the IBM version updates in little square
- > blocks, and at times, it can look quite distusting. The Amiga version seems
- > to update the whole window at once.
-
- I've seen the Amiga version update in little square blocks sometimes. I
- don't know what makes the difference. But keep in mind I don't know anything
- about the CUSeeMe protocol, nor the IBM version.
-
- I've also had it crash a lot -- either the system, or just itself. But in
- fairness, I really haven't tested it since getting MUI 3.2, which solved the
- crash problems with all my other MUI applications.
-
- --
- * From the disk of: | jshaffer@mail.csrlink.net | "there's a hell of
- Jim Shaffer, Jr. | NOTICE: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ // | a good universe
- 37 Brook Street | I've changed // | next door; let's go"
- Montgomery, PA 17752 | Internet providers. \\// | (e.e. cummings)
-